ISSN 3060-947X
高级检索
更多内容请点击

Journal of Rural Medicine ›› 2025, Vol.2 ›› Issue (7) DOI:

• 指南解读 • 上一篇     下一篇

新一轮审核评估背景下医学院校教学督导体系优化路径的思考

崔媛媛 , 呼俊迪 , 刘营 , 杨天歌 , 李瑶   
  1. 1 . 西安医学院教学质量监控与评估中心;西安医学院基础医学部
  2. 2 . 西安医学院教学质量监控与评估中心
  3. 3 . 西安医学院教学质量监控与评估中心
  4. 4 . 西安医学院教学质量监控与评估中心
  5. 5 . 西安医学院教学质量监控与评估中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-01 06:39:29 发布日期:2025-10-15
  • 通讯作者:

  • 作者贡献:
  • 基金资助:
    陕西高等教育教学改革研究项目(项目编号:23BZ052);西安医学院教师教育改革与教师发展研究项目(项目编号:2025JFZ-10);西安医学院 2024 年度教育教学改革研究项目(项目编号:JG2024-96)。

Optimization of Teaching Supervision System in Medical Universities under the New Round of Audit and Evaluation

CUI Yuanyuan HU Jundi LIU Ying YANG Tiange LI Yao   
  1. Center for Teaching Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Xi’an Medical University;Department of Basic Medicine, Xi’an Medical University
  2. Center for Teaching Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Xi’an Medical University
  3. Center for Teaching Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Xi’an Medical University
  4. Center for Teaching Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Xi’an Medical University
  5. Center for Teaching Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Xi’an Medical University
  • Received:2025-07-01 06:39:29 Online:2025-10-15
  • Contact:

摘要: 目的:立足新一轮本科教育教学审核评估对质量保障的高阶要求,探索医学院校教学督导体系建设中的核心问题与优化路径。方法:以西安医学院为研究对象,通过政策解读与问题剖析,系统梳理教学督导工作在信息化支撑不足、改进闭环断裂、结果应用薄弱、队伍发展滞后等维度的瓶颈问题。结果:以审核评估为导向,提出“数据融合、闭环强化、结果应用、队伍发展”教学督导体系的优化路径。结论:在新一轮审核评估背景下,教学督导体系的建设更需注重系统性优化,以实现从单一的“合规性检查”向复合型“发展性诊断”的转变,为医学院校强化“自查和自纠”持续改进的教学质量保障体系和形成“五自”质量文化奠定坚实的基础。

关键词: 新一轮审核评估;医学院校;教学督导;优化路径;质量保障

Abstract

Objective:To address the advanced requirements for quality assurance in the new round of undergraduate education teaching audit and evaluation, this study explores core issues and optimization pathways for teaching supervision systems in medical universities. Methods: Taking Xi’an Medical University as a case study, we systematically analyzed bottlenecks through policy interpretation and problem diagnosis, focusing on four dimensions: insufficient information technology support, disruption closed-loop improvement cycle, weak application of results, and lagging team development. Results: Audit evaluation principles guided the design of an optimized supervision framework featuring “data integration, closed-loop reinforcement, results application, and team development”. Conclusion: Under the new audit evaluation framework, teaching supervision systems require systematic optimization to shift from single “compliance inspection” toward multidimensional “developmental diagnosis”. This transformation will strengthen medical universities’ self-inspection and self-correcting quality assurance mechanisms and cultivate the “Five-Self” quality culture.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Key words: New round of audit and evaluation; Medical universities; Teaching supervision; Optimization pathway; Quality assurance

分享到微信朋友圈 ×
投稿查询 投稿指南 留言板 返回
顶部